U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 26, 2008 12:54 AM UTC

Dems for real change in education

  • 11 Comments
  • by: cologeek

I have to admit I just about fell out of my seat reading this: http://www.slate.com/id/219776…

I really enjoyed this: One panelist–I think it was Peter Groff, president of the Colorado State Senate, got the ball rolling by complaining that when the children’s agenda meets the adult agenda, the “adult agenda wins too often.”

It is good to know that there are Democrats out there that not only recognize that we have a serious problem in public education, they recognize one of the the root causes as well.  Hopefully this will lead to some real bi-partisanship in reforming an ailing system.

Comments

11 thoughts on “Dems for real change in education

  1. From Senate President Peter Groff in response to NYC school chief Joe Klein:

    Groff, a crowd favorite, made the conventional local elected officials’ objection that you need flexibiity, one size doesn’t fit all, “what works” in County X might not work in County Y. And he was booed! Loudly. By Democratic education wonks. Wow.

    Senator Groff, keep on keeping on!  One size fits all does not work everywhere.

        1. many Dems speak about new ways to approach education policy.  The problem, as illustrated by the response to Sen. Groff’s comments, is teacher unions and old school Dems will not discuss other options.

          We must do something different, throwing money at the system and relying on standardized tests is not enough.

        2. we have to make sure we don’t throw out the baby (universal, taxpayer funded eduction) out with the bathwater (old ways and systems no longer working.)

          1. holding the baby under water for 40 years so they can control the remote.

            Anything short of a reformation in the education unions won’t pass muster for me.  They’ve lost their place in line with people like Merrifield and their snotty denial of the fact that they haven’t accomplished their most basic mission.  

            1. I know from both family and personal experience that w/o some form of collective voice, the school boards run the show.

              “Take it or leave it.”  That’s pretty much how the Sarasota board treated us in forty years ago.  They also told us that our beautiful beaches help make up for the low salaries!  The NEA then was very much pretending to be a professional organization and that salary negotiations were beneath them.  The AFT, a real union, was moving out of the big cities and into the suburbs back then.  Whatever happened to them?  

            2. if schools were run your way, would teachers get raises based on standardized test scores? If that were the case, I guess I would just teach at a school in a rich, or middle class district. That way the kids who have all of the technology and the money, who perform better on high-stakes tests, will help to pave my driveway with solid 24 Karat gold.

              Without some form of collective bargaining, where is the incentive to teach at under-performing, poorer schools?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

157 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!